Walking dead isn't just the book title...
I could go into a lengthy diatribe about why someone cannot respect someone else's property and feels the need to mark it up or in some form deny others access to material that they found objectionable, but what absolutely stumps me is the simple fact that this person is apparently so incredibly offended by profanity yet is perfectly fine with with the gore and graphic violence of this story. Let me state my bias here, I don't find zombies fascinating, intriguing, or worth my time. However, our patrons obviously enjoy it--as our circ stats show--and I wouldn't dream of depriving them of their enjoyment and if I catch you, you mofo, I can guarantee that zombies will be the least of your worries!
January 17 2013, 02:12:23 UTC 5 months ago
January 17 2013, 02:19:29 UTC 5 months ago
January 17 2013, 02:28:35 UTC 5 months ago
January 17 2013, 02:53:04 UTC 5 months ago
I'm surprised someone didn't mention the markup of The Walking Dead previously, though I guess they either thought they'd have suspicion fall on them or they may have thought the library did it.
January 17 2013, 03:42:56 UTC 5 months ago
January 17 2013, 03:57:37 UTC 5 months ago
January 17 2013, 04:57:57 UTC 5 months ago
January 17 2013, 15:00:07 UTC 5 months ago
January 17 2013, 15:49:29 UTC 5 months ago
January 17 2013, 16:49:33 UTC 5 months ago
My coll dev professor in library school told us a story about an anonymous patron in his regional library with some degree of artistic talent who checked out all the local copies of Maurice Sendak's In the Night Kitchen and drew pants on the little boy in all the scenes where his bare bottom was visible. It's the kind of "radio edit" censorship that doesn't really work: everyone over the age of kindergarten knows what the missing sound or image or word is supposed to be, turning the whole exercise into some kind of pandering "think of the children!" nonsense or a pathetic attempt to be risque and naughty.
January 17 2013, 20:42:22 UTC 5 months ago
January 18 2013, 01:07:27 UTC 5 months ago
I used to work at a CD store and would get variations of this, notably one parent who insisted on buying the edited version of Eminem's Slim Shady LP for her 11-yr-old son; and another who refused to buy any kind of Blink-182 for her 14-yr-old because of the parental advisory sticker. People are silly.
January 18 2013, 10:19:02 UTC 5 months ago Edited: January 18 2013, 10:20:34 UTC
Here, our graphic novels are treated atrociously, but they're never censored. Basically every time a patron takes out a graphic novel, they crack the spine so badly that the pages slip out. I was really looking forward to re-reading the 2006 run of The Runaways, a fun little Marvel comic series, so I borrowed it and I opened the second volume and two thirds of the pages fell out. I was not a happy bunny. And I'm really gentle with my books, so why can't these people be? :(
Oh, we've also had the manga issue cropping up, but only from parents whose kids took out an inappropriate manga (to the point where we have to tell kids and parents at the desk that most manga have age ratings on the back for a reason).